What's going on
A woman explained, quite matter-of-factly, that hers was a marriage of convenience. She married for the assets. The asset in question was a cat.
She had gone to her then-boyfriend's apartment for the first time, found his cat asleep in a state of complete and unbothered dignity, and decided on the spot that she was going to marry the man and live with the animal. The photograph she posted is the one that did it. Notably, in her own retelling of the moment, the man is not referred to by name or as her boyfriend, but as that man — the obstacle standing between her and the cat.
Someone then pointed out that under Japanese law, pets are legally classified as property. Which makes the joke about marrying for assets not a joke at all, but an accurate description of what happened.
Comments
My take
Comments loosely translated for tone. Reactions collected from Togetter and X threads.
View original thread →
⚠ Original post unavailable — view on X
⚠ Original post unavailable — view on X
⚠ Original post unavailable — view on X